LOW OCCLUSION PRESSURE DURING RESISTANCE EXERCISE WITH BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION PROMOTES LOWER PAIN, PERCEPTION OF EXERCISE AND SESSION COMPARED WITH HIGH OCCLUSION PRESSURE WHEN THE TOTAL VOLUME TRAINI
"2017-06-15 00:00:00" // app/Providers/../Base/Publico/Artigo/resources/show_includes/info_artigo.blade.php
App\Base\Administrativo\Model\Artigo {#1843 // app/Providers/../Base/Publico/Artigo/resources/show_includes/info_artigo.blade.php #connection: "mysql" +table: "artigo" #primaryKey: "id" #keyType: "int" +incrementing: true #with: [] #withCount: [] +preventsLazyLoading: false #perPage: 15 +exists: true +wasRecentlyCreated: false #escapeWhenCastingToString: false #attributes: array:35 [ "id" => 30018 "edicao_id" => 61 "trabalho_id" => 397 "inscrito_id" => 297 "titulo" => "LOW OCCLUSION PRESSURE DURING RESISTANCE EXERCISE WITH BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION PROMOTES LOWER PAIN, PERCEPTION OF EXERCISE AND SESSION COMPARED WITH HIGH OCCLUSION PRESSURE WHEN THE TOTAL VOLUME TRAINI" "resumo" => """ Low-intensity resistance exercise associated with partial blood-flow restriction (BFR; 30% of onerepetition\r\n maximum [1RM]) has been proposed as an effective alternative to high-intensity\r\n resistance exercise (HI-RE; 80% of 1RM) to increase muscle mass. Interestingly, muscle\r\n adaptations related to BFR seem to be independent of the occlusion pressure magnitude, suggesting\r\n that muscle mass accrual can be achieved even with low loads. However, the occlusion pressure\r\n magnitude is thought to alter the psychophysiological stress related to BFR as measure by rating of\r\n perceived exertion scales (RPE). Despite of that, the effects of different occlusion pressures on the\r\n RPE response warrants further investigation. Additionally, session RPE (RPE-S) and pain levels\r\n can help gain insights as to whether manipulations in occlusion pressure can alter the stress related\r\n to BFR. The present study aimed to compared the RPE, RPE-S and pain levels across different\r\n magnitudes of occlusion pressures. Furthermore, all BFRs protocols were compared with a HI-RE.\r\n Twelve male subjects (age: 24.5 ± 1.5 years, height: 1.78 ± 0.04 m, body mass: 83.4 ± 11.2 kg) not\r\n engaged in lower limbs RE for the last six months participated in the present study. Subjects\r\n performed all RE protocols in a randomized and cross-over way with 72 hours apart: 1) RE with\r\n 40% of total occlusion restriction (BFR40); 2) RE with 50% of total occlusion restriction (BFR50);\r\n 3) RE with 60% of total occlusion restriction (BFR60); 4) RE with 70% of total occlusion\r\n restriction (BFR70); 5) RE with 80% of total occlusion restriction (BFR80) and; 6) RE without\r\n occlusion pressure restriction (HI-RE). BFR protocols and HI-RE were performed with 30% and\r\n 80% of 1RM, respectively. RPE and pain levels were measured before exercise and immediately\r\n after each set. RPE-S was measure 30 minutes after the end of exercise session. The main results\r\n showed that lower-pressure BFR protocols (i.e., BFR40 and BFR50) presented overall lower RPE\r\n response as compared with higher-pressure BFR (i.e., BFR70 and BFR80) and HI-RE protocols. In\r\n respect of RPE-S, BFR60, BFR70 and BFR80 protocols showed higher values than BFR40 and\r\n BFR50 protocols. The BFR80 protocol showed greater RPE-S when compared to all others\r\n conditions. Regarding pain levels, BFR40, BFR50 and HI-RE protocols, showed lower values than\r\n BFR60, BFR70 and BFR80 protocols. In conclusion, higher BFR protocols (BFR70 and BFR80)\r\n promote higher RPE, sRPE and pain compared with lower BFR protocols. """ "modalidade" => "Comunicação Oral (CO)" "area_tematica" => "AT01 - FISIOLOGIA E BIOQUÍMICA DO EXERCÍCIO; BIODINÂMICA DO RENDIMENTO E TREINAMENTO ESPORTIVO; SAÚDE E REABILITAÇÃO" "palavra_chave" => "RESISTANCE TRAINING, VASCULAR OCCLUSION, SESSION RATING OF PERCEIVED EXORTION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS" "idioma" => "Inglês" "arquivo" => "TRABALHO_EV083_MD1_SA1_ID297_EXT_23042017205348.pdf" "created_at" => "2020-05-28 15:53:15" "updated_at" => "2020-06-09 18:23:09" "ativo" => 1 "autor_nome" => "SAMUEL DOMINGOS SOLIGON" "autor_nome_curto" => "SAMUEL SOLIGON" "autor_email" => "samuelsoligon@gmail.com" "autor_ies" => "UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS (UFSCAR)" "autor_imagem" => "" "edicao_url" => "anais-x-ciefmh" "edicao_nome" => "Anais do X Congresso Internacional de Educação Fisica e Motricidade Humana e XVI Simpósio Paulista de Educação Física" "edicao_evento" => "X Congresso Internacional de Educação Física e Motricidade Humana e XVI Simpósio Paulista de Educação Física" "edicao_ano" => 2017 "edicao_pasta" => "anais/ciefmh/2017" "edicao_logo" => "5e4a1c2174ebb_17022020015249.png" "edicao_capa" => "5f182a9857128_22072020090128.jpg" "data_publicacao" => null "edicao_publicada_em" => "2017-06-15 00:00:00" "publicacao_id" => 37 "publicacao_nome" => "Anais do CIEFMH" "publicacao_codigo" => "2527-2268" "tipo_codigo_id" => 1 "tipo_codigo_nome" => "ISSN" "tipo_publicacao_id" => 1 "tipo_publicacao_nome" => "ANAIS de Evento" ] #original: array:35 [ "id" => 30018 "edicao_id" => 61 "trabalho_id" => 397 "inscrito_id" => 297 "titulo" => "LOW OCCLUSION PRESSURE DURING RESISTANCE EXERCISE WITH BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION PROMOTES LOWER PAIN, PERCEPTION OF EXERCISE AND SESSION COMPARED WITH HIGH OCCLUSION PRESSURE WHEN THE TOTAL VOLUME TRAINI" "resumo" => """ Low-intensity resistance exercise associated with partial blood-flow restriction (BFR; 30% of onerepetition\r\n maximum [1RM]) has been proposed as an effective alternative to high-intensity\r\n resistance exercise (HI-RE; 80% of 1RM) to increase muscle mass. Interestingly, muscle\r\n adaptations related to BFR seem to be independent of the occlusion pressure magnitude, suggesting\r\n that muscle mass accrual can be achieved even with low loads. However, the occlusion pressure\r\n magnitude is thought to alter the psychophysiological stress related to BFR as measure by rating of\r\n perceived exertion scales (RPE). Despite of that, the effects of different occlusion pressures on the\r\n RPE response warrants further investigation. Additionally, session RPE (RPE-S) and pain levels\r\n can help gain insights as to whether manipulations in occlusion pressure can alter the stress related\r\n to BFR. The present study aimed to compared the RPE, RPE-S and pain levels across different\r\n magnitudes of occlusion pressures. Furthermore, all BFRs protocols were compared with a HI-RE.\r\n Twelve male subjects (age: 24.5 ± 1.5 years, height: 1.78 ± 0.04 m, body mass: 83.4 ± 11.2 kg) not\r\n engaged in lower limbs RE for the last six months participated in the present study. Subjects\r\n performed all RE protocols in a randomized and cross-over way with 72 hours apart: 1) RE with\r\n 40% of total occlusion restriction (BFR40); 2) RE with 50% of total occlusion restriction (BFR50);\r\n 3) RE with 60% of total occlusion restriction (BFR60); 4) RE with 70% of total occlusion\r\n restriction (BFR70); 5) RE with 80% of total occlusion restriction (BFR80) and; 6) RE without\r\n occlusion pressure restriction (HI-RE). BFR protocols and HI-RE were performed with 30% and\r\n 80% of 1RM, respectively. RPE and pain levels were measured before exercise and immediately\r\n after each set. RPE-S was measure 30 minutes after the end of exercise session. The main results\r\n showed that lower-pressure BFR protocols (i.e., BFR40 and BFR50) presented overall lower RPE\r\n response as compared with higher-pressure BFR (i.e., BFR70 and BFR80) and HI-RE protocols. In\r\n respect of RPE-S, BFR60, BFR70 and BFR80 protocols showed higher values than BFR40 and\r\n BFR50 protocols. The BFR80 protocol showed greater RPE-S when compared to all others\r\n conditions. Regarding pain levels, BFR40, BFR50 and HI-RE protocols, showed lower values than\r\n BFR60, BFR70 and BFR80 protocols. In conclusion, higher BFR protocols (BFR70 and BFR80)\r\n promote higher RPE, sRPE and pain compared with lower BFR protocols. """ "modalidade" => "Comunicação Oral (CO)" "area_tematica" => "AT01 - FISIOLOGIA E BIOQUÍMICA DO EXERCÍCIO; BIODINÂMICA DO RENDIMENTO E TREINAMENTO ESPORTIVO; SAÚDE E REABILITAÇÃO" "palavra_chave" => "RESISTANCE TRAINING, VASCULAR OCCLUSION, SESSION RATING OF PERCEIVED EXORTION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS" "idioma" => "Inglês" "arquivo" => "TRABALHO_EV083_MD1_SA1_ID297_EXT_23042017205348.pdf" "created_at" => "2020-05-28 15:53:15" "updated_at" => "2020-06-09 18:23:09" "ativo" => 1 "autor_nome" => "SAMUEL DOMINGOS SOLIGON" "autor_nome_curto" => "SAMUEL SOLIGON" "autor_email" => "samuelsoligon@gmail.com" "autor_ies" => "UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS (UFSCAR)" "autor_imagem" => "" "edicao_url" => "anais-x-ciefmh" "edicao_nome" => "Anais do X Congresso Internacional de Educação Fisica e Motricidade Humana e XVI Simpósio Paulista de Educação Física" "edicao_evento" => "X Congresso Internacional de Educação Física e Motricidade Humana e XVI Simpósio Paulista de Educação Física" "edicao_ano" => 2017 "edicao_pasta" => "anais/ciefmh/2017" "edicao_logo" => "5e4a1c2174ebb_17022020015249.png" "edicao_capa" => "5f182a9857128_22072020090128.jpg" "data_publicacao" => null "edicao_publicada_em" => "2017-06-15 00:00:00" "publicacao_id" => 37 "publicacao_nome" => "Anais do CIEFMH" "publicacao_codigo" => "2527-2268" "tipo_codigo_id" => 1 "tipo_codigo_nome" => "ISSN" "tipo_publicacao_id" => 1 "tipo_publicacao_nome" => "ANAIS de Evento" ] #changes: [] #casts: array:14 [ "id" => "integer" "edicao_id" => "integer" "trabalho_id" => "integer" "inscrito_id" => "integer" "titulo" => "string" "resumo" => "string" "modalidade" => "string" "area_tematica" => "string" "palavra_chave" => "string" "idioma" => "string" "arquivo" => "string" "created_at" => "datetime" "updated_at" => "datetime" "ativo" => "boolean" ] #classCastCache: [] #attributeCastCache: [] #dates: [] #dateFormat: null #appends: [] #dispatchesEvents: [] #observables: [] #relations: [] #touches: [] +timestamps: false #hidden: [] #visible: [] +fillable: array:13 [ 0 => "edicao_id" 1 => "trabalho_id" 2 => "inscrito_id" 3 => "titulo" 4 => "resumo" 5 => "modalidade" 6 => "area_tematica" 7 => "palavra_chave" 8 => "idioma" 9 => "arquivo" 10 => "created_at" 11 => "updated_at" 12 => "ativo" ] #guarded: array:1 [ 0 => "*" ] }